Skip Navigation

IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 2001 21(1):107-122; doi:10.1093/imanum/21.1.107
© 2001 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kay, D.
Right arrow Articles by Silvester, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The reliability of local error estimators for convection–diffusion equations

David Kay1 and David Silvester2

1 Centre for Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK, e-mail: d.a.day{at}sussex.ac.uk 2 Department of Mathematics, UMIST, Manchester M60 1QD, UK, e-mail: na.silvester{at}na-net.ornl.gov

We assess the reliability of a simple a posteriori error estimator for steady-state convection–diffusion equations in cases where convection dominates. Our estimator is computed by solving a local Poisson problem with Neumann boundary conditions. It gives global upper and local lower bounds on the error measured in the H1 semi-norm. However, the error may be overestimated locally within boundary layers if these are not resolved by the mesh, that is, when the local mesh Péclet number is significantly greater than unity. We discuss the implications of this overestimation in a practical context where the estimator is used as a local error indicator within a self-adaptive mesh refinement process.


Received 18 June 1999. Accepted 7 March 2000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.