Skip Navigation

IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 2001 21(3):703-731; doi:10.1093/imanum/21.3.703
© 2001 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zvan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vetzal, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A finite volume approach for contingent claims valuation

R. Zvan1, P. A. Forsyth2 and K. R. Vetzal3

1 Financial Analytics and Structured Transactions, Bear Stearns, 245 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10167, USA. Email: rzvan@bear.com 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1. Email: paforsyth@elora.uwaterloo.ca 3 Centre for Advanced Studies in Finance, University of Waterloo, Canada. Email: kvetzal@watarts.uwaterloo.ca

This paper presents a finite volume approach for solving two-dimensional contingent claims valuation problems. The contingent claims PDEs are in non-divergence form. The finite volume method is more flexible than finite difference schemes which are often described in the finance literature and frequently used in practice. Moreover, the finite volume method naturally handles cases where the underlying partial differential equation becomes convection dominated or degenerate. A compact method is developed which uses a high-order flux limiter for the convection terms. This paper will demonstrate how a variety of two-dimensional valuation problems can all be solved using the same approach. The generality of the approach is in part due to the fact that changes caused by different model specifications are localized. Constraints on the solution are treated in a uniform manner using a penalty method. A variety of illustrative example computations are presented.

Key Words: finite volume; positive coefficient; contingent claims; option pricing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.