Skip Navigation

IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 2003 23(3):377-393; doi:10.1093/imanum/23.3.377
© 2003 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, Y.-X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alternate minimization gradient method

Yu-Hong Dai1 and Ya-Xiang Yuan1

1 State Key Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering Computing, Institute of Computational Mathematics and Scientific/Engineering Computing, Academy of Mathematics and System Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 2719, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China

It is well known that the minimization of a smooth function f(x) is equivalent to minimizing its gradient norm ||g(x)||2 in some sense. In this paper, we propose a modified steepest descent method, whose stepsizes alternately minimize the function value and the gradient norm along the line of steepest descent. Hence the name ‘alternate minimization (AM) gradient method’. For strictly convex quadratics, the AM method is proved to be Q-superlinearly convergent in two dimensions, and Q-linearly convergent in any dimension. Numerical experiments are presented for symmetric and positive definite linear systems. They suggest that the AM method is much better than the classical steepest descent (SD) method and comparable with some existing gradient methods. They also show that the AM method is an efficient alternative if a solution with a low precision is required. Two variants of the AM method, named shortened SD step gradient methods, are also presented and analysed in this paper. By designing a new kind of line search, the two variants are extended to the field of unconstrained optimization.

Key Words: linear system; unconstrained optimization; gradient method; monotonic and nonmonotonic; convergence rate; line search


Received 5 February 2002. Revised 11 September 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.